Collision vs Make: The Honest Comparison
Collision vs Make — pricing, capabilities and who each is for. The deciding question isn't features; it's whether you want a point product or the full growth loop.
competitive-intel/competitors.csv (verified 2026-08-14)
Collision vs Make
Visual AI automation platform (ex-Integromat, owned by Celonis): connect apps/LLMs, build automations and AI agents visually or with prompts.
Collision is positioned as the AI you hire to run growth — one intelligence that researches, plans, writes, distributes and learns across LinkedIn, X, SEO, AI search, email and outbound, with approval gates on every action.
Capability comparison
| Capability | Collision | Make |
|---|---|---|
| AI SEO | Yes | No |
| GEO / AI search | Yes | No |
| Content | Yes | No |
| Social | Yes | No |
| Outbound / email | Yes | No |
| Lead generation | Yes | No |
| One memory across surfaces | Yes | Varies |
| Human approval on every action | Yes | Varies |
Where Make genuinely wins
Deep integration ecosystem, free tier, well-resourced enterprise parent (Celonis).
Where Collision genuinely wins
Collision provides growth strategy + specialized execution vs Make's generic building blocks. Assessment.
Pricing reality
- Make: Free plan; paid from ~$9/mo; enterprise custom (Freemium)
- Collision: Launch $500–1,000/mo · Growth $2,000–6,000/mo · Scale $8,000–15,000/mo
Pricing verified 2026-08-14.
How to decide
Choose Make if their scope matches your motion and you're happy with the capabilities above. Choose Collision if you want the whole growth loop — including the parts Make doesn't cover — under one intelligence with one memory.