Collision vs Clay: The Honest Comparison

Collision vs Clay — pricing, capabilities and who each is for. The deciding question isn't features; it's whether you want a point product or the full growth loop.

competitive-intel/competitors.csv (verified 2026-08-14)

Collision vs Clay

AI GTM data platform: unify first/third-party data, 200+ provider marketplace, enrichment, signals/intent, AI workflow builder for outbound.

Collision is positioned as the AI you hire to run growth — one intelligence that researches, plans, writes, distributes and learns across LinkedIn, X, SEO, AI search, email and outbound, with approval gates on every action.

Capability comparison

Capability Collision Clay
AI SEO Yes No
GEO / AI search Yes No
Content Yes No
Social Yes No
Outbound / email Yes Yes
Lead generation Yes No
One memory across surfaces Yes Varies
Human approval on every action Yes Varies

Where Clay genuinely wins

Clay is the default AI lead-gen/data platform with unmatched enrichment and community mindshare.

Where Collision genuinely wins

Collision delivers strategy and execution across channels; Clay is a data/workflow system requiring assembly. assessment.

Pricing reality

  • Clay: From ~$54/mo (usage/credit-based; tiers to ~$446/mo) (Usage-based)
  • Collision: Launch $500–1,000/mo · Growth $2,000–6,000/mo · Scale $8,000–15,000/mo

Pricing verified 2026-08-14.

How to decide

Choose Clay if their scope matches your motion and you're happy with the capabilities above. Choose Collision if you want the whole growth loop — including the parts Clay doesn't cover — under one intelligence with one memory.